Labour Disputes
Texto da decisão
REF. FPSD-10747
Decision of the
Dispute Resolution Chamber
passed on 24 August 2023
regarding an employment-related dispute concerning the player Sammy
Solitaire Siddharta Skytte
COMPOSITION:
Frans DE WEGER (The Netherlands), Chairperson
Mario FLORES CHEMOR (Mexico), Member
Roy VERMEER (The Netherlands), Member
CLAIMANT:
Sammy Solitaire Siddharta Skytte, Denmark
Represented by Dino Osmanovic
RESPONDENT:
Concordia Chiajna, Romania
Represented by Mincu Paul Alexandru
pg. 2
REF. FPSD-10747
I. Facts of the case
1.
The relevant parties to this dispute are the Danish player, Skytte Sammy Solitaire Siddharta
(hereinafter: the player or the Claimant), and the Romanian club, Concordia Chiajna
(hereinafter: the club or the Respondent).
2.
On 7 September 2022, the club sent the player an employment offer including the following
terms and conditions (hereinafter: the Offer):
•
Duration: 12 September 2022 until 15 June 2023;
•
Remuneration: EUR 3,000 net per month. If the club enters the play-offs of the
second league, the player’s remuneration would be increased to EUR 3,500 net
per month;
•
Bonuses: EUR 10,000 net in case the club promotes to the higher league in the
end of the 2022/2023 season; and
•
Accommodation allowance: EUR 300 net per month.
3.
On 12 September 2022, the player and the club concluded an employment contract valid
as from the date of signature until 15 June 2023 (hereinafter: the Employment Contract).
4.
Pursuant to clause 3.1 of the Employment Contract, the club undertook to pay the player
a total amount of RON 132,000 net, payable as follows:
•
•
•
•
•
5.
RON 26,400 net on 30 November 2022;
RON 26,400 net on 30 January 2023;
RON 26,400 net on 30 March 2023;
RON 26,400 net on 30 May 2023; and
RON 26,400 net on 30 July 2023.
Furthermore, clauses 3.2 to 3.6 of the Employment Contract read as follows, quoted
verbatim:
“3.2. Bonuses for the period: 12.09.2022 -15.06.2023
3.2.1. If the PLAYER evolves as holder in minimum 60% of the official matches from the
2022-2023 regular season of the 2nd League Championship and only if [the club]
qualifies in the Play Off of the 2nd League Championship 2022-2023 competition season,
he will receive a performance bonus in amount of 7.350 lei/net.
pg. 3
REF. FPSD-10747
3.2.2. If the PLAYER evolves as holder in minimum 60% of the official matches of the 2nd
League Championship 2022-2023 competition season, and only if [the club] promotes
in the 151 League, at the end of the 2022-2023 competition season after the approval of
the league tables made by the Executive Committee of Romanian Football Federation, he
will receive a performance bonus in amount of 49.000 lei/net.
3.2.3. During the contract the Club will provide for player's accommodation or will pay
the amount of 1.500 lei for rent; the amount will be paid directly to the apartment owner,
according to the renting contract that will be closed between the club and the owner.
3.3. The Club reserves the right to grant also other premiums in money or other bonuses,
subject to [the player]'s conduct and performance, which led to achieving competitive
performance for each season by the decision of the Board.
3.4. The Club can retain from the sums owed to [the player], taxes, fines as well as any
other sports-related penalties in accordance with the regulations o the Romanian
Football Federation and with Internal Regulations.
3.5. The payment of the amounts provided from this contract will be paid in lei, at the
NBR exchange rate on the payment’s day.
3.6. The bonuses for the competition season are calculated and will be paid within 30
days from the RFF Executive Committee approval of the charts of the respective
competition season, the other objective and performance bonuses will be paid within 30
days from their fulfillment”.
6.
On 7 December 2022, the same parties concluded an “Additional Act” (hereinafter: the
Amendment), according to which the terms and conditions stipulated in the Employment
Contract were amended inter alia as follows:
•
Duration: 7 December 2022 until 31 December 2023;
•
Payments:
o
o
o
o
o
•
RON 24,750 net on 8 December 2022;
RON 34,650 net on 30 January 2023;
RON 34,650 net on 30 March 2023;
RON 34,650 net on 30 May 2023;
RON 34,650 net on 30 June 2023.
Bonuses and other relevant provisions:
o
“3.1.2. In the case in which [the club] promotes in the 1st League at the end of
2022-2023 season competitive after rankings approval are made by the
pg. 4
REF. FPSD-10747
Executive Committee of the FRF, the player will receive monthly for the period
of 01.07.2023 – 31.12.2023 the amount of 39.600 lei/net”.
o
“If [the club] at the end of competitive season 2022-2023 will not promote o
the 1st League, in the period 01.06.2023 - 30.06.2023, the player represented
by his agent will negotiate with [the club] an eventual transfer of the player”.
o
“3.2.2. If the player in the period 01.01.2023 until the end of the regular season
2022-2023 of the 2nd League Championship plays as holder in at least 60% of
the official matches and only if [the club] at the end of the regular season will
qualify in the play off of the competitive season 2022-2023 of the 2nd League
Championship, he will receive a performance bonus in value of 24.750 lei/net.
3.2.3. The club will provide for the player accommodation during the
contractual period or will pay the amount of 1.500 lei/net for rent; the amount
will be paid directly to the apartment owner, according to a renting that will
be closed between the club and the owner.
3.2.4. During the contractual period the club will provide for the player with 6
(six) round-trip flying tickets, on the route Bucharest – Billund”.
7.
On 11 May 2023, the player put the club in default and requested payment of RON 34,650
net as outstanding remuneration since 30 March 2023. Contextually, he explained that the
last payment made by the club was dated 30 January 2023 and corresponded to amounts
due for 2022. Furthermore, the player stressed that he had been excluded from the
training sessions since the beginning of April and requested the club to remedy the breach
until 26 May 2023.
8.
On 27 June 2023, the player notified the club of the termination of their employment
relationship due to inter alia overdue payables. In particular, the player claimed that RON
69,300 was outstanding (i.e., the instalments due on 30 March and 30 May 2023); and he
was still being forced to train alone or with the second team. He referred to both art. 14
and 14bis of the FIFA Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (RSTP) and
requested the club to pay his outstanding remuneration and compensation for breach of
contract.
9.
On 28 June 2023, the club acknowledged receipt of the player’s termination notice. It
moreover asked the player if he had any suggestion for solving the matter.
10. The player informed that he remained unemployed following the termination of the
Employment Contract.
pg. 5
REF. FPSD-10747
II. Proceedings before FIFA
11. On 1 July 2023, the player filed the claim at hand before FIFA. A brief summary of the
position of the parties is detailed in continuation.
a. Position of the Claimant
12. In his claim, the player alleged that the club breached the Employment Contract both by
failing to deliver his remuneration and by excluding him from training sessions with the
first team. Furthermore, he highlighted that the club did not dispute (thus, accepted) the
existence of just cause for the termination.
13. In light of the above, the player requested to be awarded the following amounts:
•
•
RON 94,050 net as outstanding remuneration, broken down as follows:
o
RON 34,650 net as salaries from February and March 2023, plus 5%
interest p.a. as from 30 March 2023;
o
RON 34,650 net as salaries from April and May 2023, plus 5% interest p.a.
as from 30 May 2023; and
o
RON 24,750 net as bonus for the qualification to the play-offs of the
2022/2023 second league national competition, plus 5% interest p.a. as
from 11 April 2023.
RON 272,250 net as compensation for breach of contract plus 5% interest p.a. as
from 27 June 2023, corresponding to the residual value of the Employment
Contract (and its Amendment), broken down as follows:
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
34,650 Lei/net falling due on 30 June 2023;
39,600 Lei/net falling due on 31 July 2023;
39,600 Lei/net falling due on 31 August 2023;
39,600 Lei/net falling due on 30 September 2023;
39,600 Lei/net falling due on 31 October 2023;
39,600 Lei/net falling due on 30 November 2023;
39,600 Lei/net falling due on 31 December 2023.
14. Regarding the quantum of compensation, the player explained that if the club’s team was
promoted to the first division at the end of the season 2022/2023 his salaries would be
fixed at RON 39,600 each. Thus, and in the absence of a clear contractual stipulation
establishing otherwise, he held that such amount should be considered for the calculation.
15. The player’s requests for relief were as follows, quoted verbatim:
pg. 6
REF. FPSD-10747
“I. The Claim filed by Mr. Skytte Sammy Solitaire Siddharta is fully upheld;
II. The Respondent is ordered to pay to the Claimant the total amount of 94,050.00
Lei/net (ninety four thousand and fifty Romanian Leu) on the name of the overdue
payables;
III. The Respondent is ordered to pay to the Claimant the amount corresponding to the
interest rate of 5 % p.a. applicable in the following way:
- over the amount of 34,650 Lei/net for the salaries for February and March 2023 as from
30 March 2023 up until the date of the effective payment;
- over the amount of 34,650 Lei/net for salaries for April and May 2023 as from 30 May
2023 up until the date of the effective payment;
- over the amount of 24,750 Lei/net for the bonus as from 11 April 2023 up until the date
of the effective payment.
IV. The Respondent is ordered to pay to the Claimant the amount of 272,250.00 Lei/net
(two hundred seventy two thousand two hundred and fifty Romanian Leu) on the name
of the compensation for the breach of the contract without just cause, plus the interest
at the rate of 5% p.a. as of 27 June 2023 until the date of effective payment;
V. The Respondent is ordered to provide the evidence that the corresponding pension
contributions and the social security costs, as required by law, as well as the tax and
medical insurance obligations are complied with and paid;
VI. Disciplinary sporting sanctions imposed on the Respondent accordingly, due to
serious and constant breach of contractual and employer duties in case of disobedience
with the FIFA decision”.
b. Position of the club
16. On 27 July 2023, the club submitted its reply to the claim of the player.
17. In doing so, the club acknowledged that it failed to pay the player part of its dues due to
financial difficulties. Nevertheless, it challenged the quantum claimed as follows:
Concept
RON 69,300 net as the outstanding
instalments due in March and May
2023.
RON 24,750 net as bonus for the
qualification to the play-offs of the
Position of the club
Accepted. Pending and due, together with
interests.
Disputed. According to the club, its team did not
qualify to the play-offs but only to the play-out.
pg. 7
REF. FPSD-10747
2022/2023 second league national
competition.
RON 272,250 net as compensation
for breach of contract.
Consequently, the bonus clause was not triggered,
therefore the amount is not due.
Partially disputed. The total compensation owed
to the player amounts to RON 34,650 net (i.e.,
total remuneration of RON 163,350 minus the
amounts already paid of RON 59,400 net minus
the overdue payables of RON 69,300 net).
18. Specifically concerning the compensation, the club highlighted that its team has not been
promoted to the higher league in the national championship, thus the contractual
provision indicating an increase of his remuneration was not triggered. Furthermore, it
argued that the player misinterpreted the Employment Contract (and its Amendment), and
no additional amount should be payable for the period between 1 July and 31 December
2023.
19. Lastly, the club argued that the player’s claim to be provided with certificates on taxes and
social contributions should be rejected “because FIFA does not have jurisdiction to analyse
social security obligations, tax and medical insurance taxes because those tax payments are
carefully monitored by the Romanian National Agency for Fiscal Administration. Moreover, this
evidence can be required by the Claimant to the Romanian National Agency for Fiscal
Administration, but only after the payment is made”.
III. Considerations of the Dispute Resolution Chamber
a. Competence and applicable legal framework
20. First of all, the Dispute Resolution Chamber (hereinafter also referred to as Chamber or
DRC) analysed whether it was competent to deal with the case at hand. In this respect, it
took note that the present matter was presented to FIFA on 1 July 2023 and submitted for
decision on 24 August 2023. Taking into account the wording of art. 34 of the March 2023
edition of the Procedural Rules Governing the Football Tribunal (hereinafter: the Procedural
Rules), the aforementioned edition of the Procedural Rules is applicable to the matter at
hand.
21. Subsequently, the members of the Chamber referred to art. 2 par. 1 of the Procedural Rules
and observed that in accordance with art. 23 par. 1 in combination with art. 22 par. 1 lit. b)
of the FIFA RSTP (May 2023 edition), the DRC is competent to deal with the matter at stake,
which concerns an employment-related dispute with an international dimension between
a Danish player and a Romanian club.
22. Subsequently, the Chamber analysed which regulations should be applicable as to the
substance of the matter. In this respect, it confirmed that, in accordance with art. 26 par. 1
and 2 of the FIFA RSTP (May 2023 edition) and considering that the present claim was
pg. 8
REF. FPSD-10747
lodged on 1 July 2023, the cited May 2023 edition of said regulations (hereinafter: the
Regulations) is applicable to the matter at hand as to the substance.
b. Burden of proof
23. The Chamber recalled the basic principle of burden of proof, as stipulated in art. 13
par. 5 of the Procedural Rules, according to which a party claiming a right on the basis of
an alleged fact shall carry the respective burden of proof. Likewise, the Chamber stressed
the wording of art. 13 par. 4 of the Procedural Rules, pursuant to which it may consider
evidence not filed by the parties, including without limitation the evidence generated by or
within the Transfer Matching System (TMS).
c. Merits of the dispute
24. Its competence and the applicable regulations having been established, the Chamber
entered into the merits of the dispute. In this respect, the Chamber started by
acknowledging all the above-mentioned facts as well as the arguments and the
documentation on file. However, the Chamber emphasised that in the following
considerations it will refer only to the facts, arguments, and documentary evidence, which
it considered pertinent for the assessment of the matter at hand.
i. Main legal discussion and considerations
25. The foregoing having been established, the Chamber moved to the substance of the
matter, and took note of the fact that it pertains to a claim for outstanding remuneration
and compensation for breach of contract lodged by the player against the club.
26. The Chamber also noted that the Employment Contract was terminated on 27 June 2023
by the player, due to overdue payables. In particular, it remained undisputed between the
parties that such termination took place with just cause in line with art. 14bis of the
Regulations.
27. In this context, and while such just cause was confirmed, the Chamber acknowledged that
its task was limited to determine the amounts that should be paid by the club to the player
as a consequence thereto, namely as outstanding remuneration and compensation for
breach of contract.
A.
Outstanding Remuneration
28. Initially, the Chamber outlined that the instalments due by the club to the player on 30
March 2023 and 30 May 2023 were undisputedly pending and overdue. Consequently, and
by referring to the general legal principle of pacta sunt servanda, the Chamber decided that
pg. 9
REF. FPSD-10747
the club should be liable to pay the amounts sought, totalling RON 69,300 net (i.e., 2 times
RON 34,650).
29. Taking into consideration the player’s request as well as the constant practice of the
Chamber in this regard, the latter decided to award him interest at the rate of 5% p.a. on
the outstanding amounts as from respective due dates until the date of effective payment.
30. In addition, the DRC observed the player claimed to be entitled to RON 24,750 net as bonus
for the qualification to the play-off of the 2022/2023 second league national competition.
Nevertheless, the Chamber took due consideration that the evidence provided by both the
player and the club confirmed that its team did not qualify to the ”play-off” of the national
league, but rather to the “play-out”.
31. In light of the above, the DRC determined that the sporting goal mentioned in the
Amendment was not achieved, and the condition therefore triggering the corresponding
payment not met. Therefore, the Chamber decided that this specific part of the claim of
the player should be rejected.
B.
Compensation
32. Having stated the above, the Chamber turned to the calculation of the amount of
compensation payable to the player by the club in the case at stake. In doing so, the
Chamber firstly recapitulated that, in accordance with art. 17 par. 1 of the Regulations, the
amount of compensation shall be calculated, in particular and unless otherwise provided
for in the contract at the basis of the dispute, with due consideration for the law of the
country concerned, the specificity of sport and further objective criteria, including in
particular, the remuneration and other benefits due to the player under the existing
contract and/or the new contract, the time remaining on the existing contract up to a
maximum of five years, and depending on whether the contractual breach falls within the
protected period.
33. In application of the relevant provision, the Chamber held that it first of all had to clarify as
to whether the pertinent employment contract contained a provision by means of which
the parties had beforehand agreed upon an amount of compensation payable by the
contractual parties in the event of breach of contract. In this regard, the Chamber
established that no such compensation clause was included in the employment contract at
the basis of the matter at stake.
34. As a consequence, the members of the Chamber determined that the amount of
compensation payable by the club to the player had to be assessed in application of the
other parameters set out in art. 17 par. 1 of the Regulations. The Chamber recalled that
said provision provides for a non-exhaustive enumeration of criteria to be taken into
consideration when calculating the amount of compensation payable.
pg. 10
REF. FPSD-10747
35. Bearing in mind the foregoing, the Chamber proceeded with the calculation of the monies
payable to the player under the terms of the Employment Contract (and its Amendment)
from the date of its unilateral termination until its end date. In doing so, the DRC
acknowledged that the parties have different views on the quantum, as follows:
•
According to the player, he should be entitled to RON 272,250 net as
compensation for breach of contract, corresponding to the residual value of the
Employment Contract calculated as if club was promoted to the higher division
of the national league; and
•
According to the club, the player should only receive RON 34,650 net as
compensation, corresponding to the instalment due on 30 June 2023. Per its
interpretation of the Employment Contract, as the club was not promoted, no
additional amount should be payable for the period between 1 July and 31
December 2023.
36. In view of this dissent between the parties, the Chamber turned to the documentation on
file and especially to the analysis of the Employment Contract and its Amendment. In doing
so, the DRC noted that whilst the Amendment established that the Employment Contract
would be valid until 31 December 2023, it did only stipulate the remuneration that would
be due to the player in case the club qualified to the higher division of the national league.
However, the wording of the Amendment is not clear to establish the consequences of (i)
its team not promoting to the higher division; and (ii) the player not being transferred to
another club.
37. For ease of reference, the Chamber recalled that the relevant contractual provisions in this
respect read as follows:
•
“3.1.2. In the case in which [the club] promotes in the 1st League at the end of 20222023 season competitive after rankings approval are made by the Executive
Committee of the FRF, the player will receive monthly for the period of 01.07.2023 –
31.12.2023 the amount of 39.600 lei/net”.
•
“If [the club] at the end of competitive season 2022-2023 will not promote o the 1st
League, in the period 01.06.2023 - 30.06.2023, the player represented by his agent
will negotiate with [the club] an eventual transfer of the player”.
38. Having established that no promotion was achieved, the DRC deemed that the underlying
question to be answered was whether the player would still be entitled to any additional
amount from July until December 2023 – to be awarded as part of compensation for breach
of contract.
39. While considering the above, the Chamber was of the opinion that, by extending the term
of the Employment Contract, the club committed itself to retain the player’s services until
pg. 11
REF. FPSD-10747
the end of 2023 and could not in good faith withdraw from its consent just because its team
could not promote to the higher division. Even worse, however, would be admitting that
the player would still be bounded to the club without receiving any remuneration.
40. Based on the foregoing in combination with the principle of in dubio contra stipulatorem,
the Chamber determined that the player should be entitled to his remuneration until the
end of 2023. On balance, and provided that the club was not promoted to the higher
division of the national league, the Chamber also ruled that the amount of compensation
for breach of contract due to the player should be calculated under the same financial
conditions valid at the time of the termination and not the ones applicable in case the club
was disputing the first league.
41. Given the foregoing, the DRC underscored that the residual value of the Employment
Contract amounted to RON 138,600 net, broken down as follows:
•
RON 34,650 net as the instalment due on 30 June 2023; plus
•
RON 103,950 net for the six remaining months (i.e., from July until December
2023), being RON 34,650 net every two months (and not per month as claimed).
42. In continuation, the Chamber verified as to whether the player had signed an employment
contract with another club during the relevant period, by means of which he would have
been enabled to reduce his loss of income. According to the constant practice of the DRC
as well as art. 17 par. 1 lit. ii) of the Regulations, such remuneration under a new
employment contract shall be taken into account in the calculation of the amount of
compensation for breach of contract in connection with the player’s general obligation to
mitigate his damages.
43. Indeed, the player did not find a new employment for the overlapping period, therefore
was not able to mitigate the damages. Likewise, the Chamber referred to art. 17 par. 1 lit.
ii) of the Regulations and decided that no additional compensation was applicable.
44. Consequently, on account of all the above-mentioned considerations and the specificities
of the case at hand, the Chamber decided that the club must pay the amount of RON
138,600 net to the player, which was to be considered a reasonable and justified amount
of compensation for breach of contract in the present matter.
45. Lastly, taking into consideration the player’s request as well as the practice of the Chamber
in this regard, the latter decided to award the player interest on said compensation at the
rate of 5% p.a. as of the date of the termination of the employment relationship between
the parties (i.e., 27 June 2023) until the date of effective payment.
pg. 12
REF. FPSD-10747
ii. Compliance with monetary decisions
46. Finally, taking into account the applicable Regulations, the Chamber referred to art. 24 par.
1 and 2 of the Regulations, which stipulate that, with its decision, the pertinent FIFA
deciding body shall also rule on the consequences deriving from the failure of the
concerned party to pay the relevant amounts of outstanding remuneration and/or
compensation in due time.
47. In this regard, the DRC highlighted that, against clubs, the consequence of the failure to
pay the relevant amounts in due time shall consist of a ban from registering any new
players, either nationally or internationally, up until the due amounts are paid. The overall
maximum duration of the registration ban shall be of up to three entire and consecutive
registration periods.
48. Therefore, bearing in mind the above, the DRC decided that the club must pay the full
amount due (including all applicable interest) to the player within 45 days of notification of
the decision, failing which, at the request of the player, a ban from registering any new
players, either nationally or internationally, for the maximum duration of three entire and
consecutive registration periods shall become immediately effective on the club in
accordance with art. 24 par. 2, 4, and 7 of the Regulations.
49. The Respondent shall make full payment (including all applicable interest) to the bank
account provided by the player in the Bank Account Registration Form, which is attached
to the present decision.
50. The DRC recalled that the above-mentioned ban will be lifted immediately and prior to its
complete serving upon payment of the due amounts, in accordance with art. 24 par. 8 of
the Regulations.
d. Costs
51. The Chamber referred to art. 25 par. 1 of the Procedural Rules, according to which
“Procedures are free of charge where at least one of the parties is a player, coach, football agent,
or match agent”. Accordingly, the Chamber decided that no procedural costs were to be
imposed on the parties.
52. Likewise, and for the sake of completeness, the Chamber recalled the contents of art. 25
par. 8 of the Procedural Rules, and decided that no procedural compensation shall be
awarded in these proceedings.
53. Lastly, the DRC concluded its deliberations by rejecting any other requests for relief made
by any of the parties.
pg. 13
REF. FPSD-10747
IV. Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber
1.
The claim of the Claimant, Sammy Solitaire Siddharta Skytte, is partially accepted.
2.
The Respondent, Concordia Chiajna, must pay to the Claimant the following amount(s):
- RON 34,650 net as outstanding remuneration plus 5% interest p.a. as from 31 March
2023 until the date of effective payment;
- RON 34,650 net as outstanding remuneration plus 5% interest p.a. as from 31 May 2023
until the date of effective payment; and
- RON 138,600 net as compensation for breach of contract without just cause plus 5%
interest p.a. as from 27 June 2023 until the date of effective payment.
3.
Any further claims of the Claimant are rejected.
4.
Full payment (including all applicable interest) shall be made to the bank account indicated
in the enclosed Bank Account Registration Form.
5.
Pursuant to art. 24 of the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players, if full payment
(including all applicable interest) is not made within 45 days of notification of this decision,
the following consequences shall apply:
1. The Respondent shall be banned from registering any new players, either nationally or
internationally, up until the due amount is paid. The maximum duration of the ban shall
be of up to three entire and consecutive registration periods.
2. The present matter shall be submitted, upon request, to the FIFA Disciplinary Committee
in the event that full payment (including all applicable interest) is still not made by the
end of the three entire and consecutive registration periods.
6.
The consequences shall only be enforced at the request of the Claimant in accordance
with art. 24 par. 7 and 8 and art. 25 of the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players.
7.
This decision is rendered without costs.
For the Football Tribunal:
Emilio García Silvero
Chief Legal & Compliance Officer
pg. 14
REF. FPSD-10747
NOTE RELATED TO THE APPEAL PROCEDURE:
According to article 57 par. 1 of the FIFA Statutes, this decision may be appealed against before
the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) within 21 days of receipt of the notification of this
decision.
NOTE RELATED TO THE PUBLICATION:
FIFA may publish this decision. For reasons of confidentiality, FIFA may decide, at the request
of a party within five days of the notification of the motivated decision, to publish an
anonymised or a redacted version (cf. article 17 of the Procedural Rules Governing the Football
Tribunal).
CONTACT INFORMATION
Fédération Internationale de Football Association
FIFA-Strasse 20 P.O. Box 8044 Zurich Switzerland
www.fifa.com | legal.fifa.com | [email protected] | T: +41 (0)43 222 7777
pg. 15