Labour Disputes
Texto da decisão
REF 20-01617
Decision of the
Dispute Resolution Chamber
passed on 11 March 2021
regarding an employment-related dispute concerning the player Willian Schuster Dornelles da Silva
COMPOSITION:
Clifford J. Hendel (USA & France), Deputy Chairman
Tomislav Kasalo (Croatia), member
Mohamed Muzammil (Singapore), member
CLAIMANT:
Willian Schuster Dornelles da Silva, Brazil
Represented by Mr Felipe de Macedo
RESPONDENT:
Al Shamal SC, Qatar
Represented by Effori Sports Law
Page 2 of 8
REF 20-01617
I.
Facts
1.
According to the Claimant, on 14 March 2019, he was approached via phone by the coach
of the Respondent, by means of which he expressed his interest.
2.
According to the claimant, he subsequently received a letter with the following contents:
“Consider that after the #training period# the player and the club Al Shamal SC will
discuss all the conditions for one-year contract that must start on July 2019. Al Shamal
SC will provide to the player a pre contract before he leaves Doha city in the beginning
of May 2019.
During the training period the AL Shamal SC will pay all expenses in Doha, it means land
transportation, food, and accommodation.
The visa entry will be provided by Al Shamal SC after the agreement of the player to
travel to Doha.
This invitation has the character of exclusivity to the above-mentioned plyer.
The airplane ticket will be refunded by Qatar stars league (contract include the ticket
prices).”
3.
On 20 April 2019, the player travelled from Brazil to Qatar.
4.
According to the player, an agreement was reached from July 2019 until July 2020, for
a salary of USD 100,000.
5.
However, according to the player, on 27 April 2019, he suffered a severe injury and,
following a diagnose in Doha, a local doctor concluded that “treatment options
discussed and arthroscopy would not bring benefit what he is expecting; advised to
modify his activity”.
6.
According to the player, he went to brazil for a second opinion and the club did not
make any objection to this.
7.
The player explained that he had to recover for nine months.
8.
According to the player, on 16 March 2020, he sent a default notice to the club,
requesting the reimbursement of his medical costs (BRL 26,828) and his outstanding
salaries (USD 75,000).
9.
On 6 November 2020, the claimant lodged a claim before FIFA on the basis of the
invitation letter, and requested the payment of USD 75,000, corresponding to 9 monthly
salaries (USD 8,333.33*9), as well as BRL 26,828, corresponding to the reimbursement of
medical costs, plus 5% interest p.a. as from the due dates.
10. In addition, the claimant requested the payment of “attorney's fees at the rate of 20%
on the value of the conviction.”
11. The claimant explained in this respect that his rsalary request is based on a verbal
agreement.
Page 3 of 8
REF 20-01617
12. In its reply to the claim, the Respondent rejected the player’s arguments.
13. In this respect, the Respondent argued that, contrary to the Claim, it has respected
the invitation letter, including due payment of the Claimant’s accommodation,
tickets and medical expenses and during his time in Doha.
14. The Respondent denied having signed a pre-contract or any contract and never
mentioned that the invitation letter can be considered as a valid employment
contract
15. The Respondent further noted that the amount of BRL 26,828 as part of the medical
expenses was not with the Player.
II. Considerations of the Dispute Resolution Chamber
1. First of all, the Dispute Resolution Chamber (hereinafter also referred to
as Chamber or DRC) analysed whether it was competent to deal with the case at hand. In
this respect, it took note that the present matter was submitted to FIFA on 6 November
2020. Taking into account the wording of art. 21 of the January 2021 edition of the Rules
Governing the Procedures of the Players’ Status Committee and the Dispute Resolution
Chamber (hereinafter: the Procedural Rules), the aforementioned edition of the
Procedural Rules is applicable to the matter at hand.
2. Subsequently, the Dispute Resolution Chamber referred to art. 3 par. 1 of the Procedural
Rules and emphasised that, in accordance with art. 24 par. 1 in combination with art.
22 lit. b) of the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players, the Dispute Resolution
Chamber is competent to deal with matters which concern employment-related disputes
with an international dimension between players and clubs, such as the present one,
which involves a player from Brazil and a club from Qatar.
3. In continuation, the Dispute Resolution Chamber analysed which edition of the
Regulations of the Status and Transfer of Players should be applicable to the present
matter. In this respect, the Dispute Resolution Chamber confirmed that in accordance
with art. 26 par. 1 and 2 of the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players, and
considering the date of the claim, the June 2020 edition of the aforementioned
regulations (hereinafter: the Regulations) is applicable to the matter at hand.
4. With the above having been established, the Dispute Resolution Chamber entered into
the substance of the matter. In doing so, it started to acknowledge the facts of the case
as well as the documents contained in the file. However, the Dispute Resolution Chamber
emphasized that in the following considerations it will refer only to facts, arguments and
documentary evidence which it considered pertinent for the assessment of the matter at
hand.
5. In this respect, the Chamber noted, that, according to the Claimant, on 14 March 2019,
he was approached by the coach of the Respondent, and subsequently received a letter
from the latter with, inter alia, the following contents:
Page 4 of 8
REF 20-01617
“Consider that after the #training period# the player and the club Al Shamal SC will
discuss all the conditions for one-year contract that must start on July 2019. Al Shamal
SC will provide to the player a pre contract before he leaves Doha city in the beginning
of May 2019.
During the training period the AL Shamal SC will pay all expenses in Doha, it means land
transportation, food, and accommodation.
The visa entry will be provided by Al Shamal SC after the agreement of the player to
travel to Doha.
This invitation has the character of exclusivity to the above-mentioned plyer.
The airplane ticket will be refunded by Qatar stars league (contract include the ticket
prices).”
6. Thereafter, the Chamber noted that the Claimant lodged a claim on the basis of said
invitation letter, requesting the payment of USD 75,000, corresponding to 9 monthly
salaries (USD 8,333.33*9), as well as BRL 26,828, corresponding to the reimbursement of
medical costs.
7. Conversely, the Chamber took note of the Respondent’s position, which denied having
signed a pre-contract or any contract, and that the invitation letter cannot be
considered as a valid employment contract.
8. In view of the above, the Chamber noted that the main legal issue at stake is to determine
whether the parties were bound by an employment relationship and, in particular,
whether the “invitation letter” can be considered as an employment contract.
9. In this regard, the Chamber recalled that in order for an employment contract to be
considered as valid and binding, apart from the signature of both the employer and the
employee, it should contain the essentialia negotii of an employment contract, such as
(but not limited to) the parties to the contract and their role, the duration of the
employment relationship and the remuneration agreed upon between the parties. After
a careful study of the draft contract presented by the player, the members of the
Chamber concluded that the invitation letter did not stipulate a salary or remuneration
for the player’s services as a football player. As a result, the Chamber unanimously
considered that said document cannot be considered as an employment contract.
10. However, and for the sake of completeness, the Chamber noted that, according to the
player, a “verbal agreement” was reached concerning his salary.
11. Yet, in this regard, the Dispute Resolution Chamber reminded the parties of the contents
of art. 12 par. 3 of the Procedural Rules, according to which “any party claiming a right
on the basis of an alleged fact shall carry the burden of proof”.
12. In application of the aforementioned principle, the Chamber observed that the Claimant
failed to provide any convincing documentary evidence about a possible agreement on a
specific salary. Hence, the Chamber rejected the Claimant’s arguments in this regard.
13. Nevertheless, the Chamber noted that the player also requested BRL 26,828,
corresponding to the reimbursement of medical costs, which were arisen due to an injury
that occurred on 27 April 2019, i.e. when the player was in Qatar, during his trial with the
club.
Page 5 of 8
REF 20-01617
14. In relation to said request, the Chamber noted that the invitation stated that “During the
training period the Al Shamal SC will pay all expenses in Doha”. In addition, the Chamber
noted that, in his reply, the Respondent acknowledged that, from its obligations arisen
from the invitation letter, the payment of medical expenses was included.
15. As a result, the Chamber understood that the Claimant duly justified the incurred medical
expenses in the amount of BRL 26,828, and that the Respondent acknowledged its
obligation in this respect.
16. Therefore, the Chamber established that the Respondent shall pay to the Claimant, the
amount of BRL 26,828, as reimbursement for medical expenses.
17. Moreover, taking into account the request of the Claimant as well as the longstanding
jurisprudence in this regard, the Dispute Resolution Chamber decided to award 5%
interest p.a. over said amount as from the date of the claim.
18. As to the requested legal fees, the Chamber referred to art. 18 pars. 2 and 4, according
to which “DRC proceedings relating to disputes between clubs and players in relation to
the maintenance of contractual stability as well as international employment related
disputes between a club and a player are free of charge” and “no procedural
compensation shall be awarded in proceedings of the Players’ Status Committee and the
DRC.”
19. Furthermore, taking into account the previous considerations, the Dispute Resolution
Chamber referred to par. 1 and 2 of art. 24bis of the Regulations, which stipulate that,
with its decision, the pertinent FIFA deciding body shall also rule on the consequences
deriving from the failure of the concerned party to pay the relevant amounts of
outstanding remuneration and/or compensation in due time.
20. In this regard, the Dispute Resolution Chamber pointed out that, against clubs, the
consequence of the failure to pay the relevant amounts in due time shall consist of a ban
from registering any new players, either nationally or internationally, up until the due
amounts are paid and for the maximum duration of three entire and consecutive
registration periods.
21. Therefore, bearing in mind the above, the Dispute Resolution Chamber decided that, in
the event that the Respondent does not pay the amounts due to the Claimant within 45
days as from the moment in which the Claimant, following the notification of the present
decision, communicates the relevant bank details to the Respondent, a ban from
registering any new players, either nationally or internationally, for the maximum
duration of three entire and consecutive registration periods shall become effective on
the Respondent in accordance with art. 24bis par. 2 and 4 of the Regulations.
22. Finally, the Dispute Resolution Chamber recalled that the above-mentioned ban will be
lifted immediately and prior to its complete serving upon payment of the due amounts,
in accordance with art. 24bis par. 3 of the Regulations.
Page 6 of 8
REF 20-01617
III. Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber
1.
The claim of the Claimant, Willian Schuster Dornelles da Silva, is partially accepted.
2.
The Respondent, Al Shamal SC, has to pay to the Claimant, the amount of BRL 26,828 as
reimbursement for medical expenses, plus 5% interest p.a. as from 6 November 2020 until
the date of effective payment.
3.
Any further claims of the Claimant are rejected.
4.
The Claimant is directed to immediately and directly inform the Respondent of the
relevant bank account to which the Respondent must pay the due amount.
5.
The Respondent shall provide evidence of payment of the due amount in accordance with
this decision to [email protected], duly translated, if applicable, into one of the official
FIFA languages (English, French, German, Spanish).
6.
In the event that the amount due, plus interest as established above is not paid by the
Respondent within 45 days, as from the notification by the Claimant of the relevant
bank details to the Respondent, the following consequences shall arise:
1. The Respondent shall be banned from registering any new players, either nationally
or internationally, up until the due amount is paid and for the maximum duration
of three entire and consecutive registration periods. The aforementioned ban
mentioned will be lifted immediately and prior to its complete serving, once the
due amount is paid.
(cf. art. 24bis of the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players).
2. In the event that the payable amount as per in this decision is still not paid by the
end of the ban of three entire and consecutive registration periods, the present
matter shall be submitted, upon request, to the FIFA Disciplinary Committee.
For the Dispute Resolution Chamber:
Emilio García Silvero
Chief Legal & Compliance Officer
Page 7 of 8
REF 20-01617
NOTE RELATED TO THE APPEAL PROCEDURE:
According to article 58 par. 1 of the FIFA Statutes, this decision may be appealed against before
the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) within 21 days of receipt of the notification of this
decision.
NOTE RELATED TO THE PUBLICATION:
FIFA may publish this decision. For reasons of confidentiality, FIFA may decide, at the request of a
party within five days of the notification of the motivated decision, to publish an anonymised or
a redacted version (cf. article 20 of the Procedural Rules).
CONTACT INFORMATION:
Fédération Internationale de Football Association
FIFA-Strasse 20 P.O. Box 8044 Zurich Switzerland
www.fifa.com | legal.fifa.com | [email protected] | T: +41 (0)43 222 7777
Page 8 of 8