Labour Disputes
Texto da decisão
REF 20-00307
Decision of the DRC Judge
passed on 24 March 2021
regarding an employment-related dispute concerning the player Luiz Jorge Matheus
COMPOSITION:
Daan de Jong (Netherlands), DRC Judge
CLAIMANT:
Luiz Jorge Matheus, Brazil
RESPONDENT:
Shabab Al Ahli Dubai FC, United Arab Emirates
Page 2 of 7
REF 20-00307
I.
Facts
1.
According to the player, on 1 October 2017, he club concluded an employment contract
valid as until 30 May 2018, i.e. 8 Months.
2.
According to clause 3 of the contract, the player was allegedly entitled to a monthly salary
of USD 3,500.
3.
The signature part of the contract as provided by the player is as follows:
4.
On 17 February 2020, the player sent a default letter to the club, requesting the payment
of the amount of USD 28,000, granting a “maximum of 10 days” to remedy the default.
5.
On 2 February 2020, the player lodged a claim for outstanding remuneration only,
requesting the payment of the total amount of USD 28,000, and corresponding to the
entire value of the contract (i.e. 3,500*8), plus “05% p.a.” interest.
6.
In its reply, and should the matter not be considered as time-barred, the club argued the
following:
“- The Player was not a professional Player and had no valid contract signed with the
Club
b- The Player played with the Club for approx. 2 months and did not have a professional
futsal player status nor a contract”
7.
In this respect, the club requested the payment of the “club’s lawyers’ fees that are
estimated at 5000 USD”.
Page 3 of 7
REF 20-00307
8.
The club denied having any signed contract with the player, and explained that
“negotiations might have taken place to sign a contract, but no contract was concluded.”
9.
The club admitted however that it registered the player as an amateur in the Futsal
League of the UAE.
10. The club further attached a document dated 20 December 2017 with the following
contents:
“Shabab Al Ahli Club would like to send you its regards and wishes you all the very best
and thanking you for the support you always present to the Club.
In reference to the above mentioned subject, please note that the Futsal Team would like
to terminate its relationship with the Futsal Player Mathieus Luiz George the Futsal Player.
Therefore we would wish you take the appropriate steps towards issuing a repatriation
ticket and pay him any dues in lieu of his participation with the Club.”
II.
Considerations of the DRC Judge
1. First of all, the DRC Judge (hereinafter also referred to as Judge or DRC
Judge) analysed whether it was competent to deal with the case at hand. Taking into
account the wording of art. 21 of the January 2021 edition of the Rules Governing the
Procedures of the Players’ Status Committee and the Dispute Resolution Chamber
(hereinafter: the Procedural Rules), the aforementioned edition of the Procedural Rules
is applicable to the matter at hand.
2. Subsequently, the DRC Judge referred to art. 3 par. 1 of the Procedural Rules
and emphasised that, in accordance with art. 24 par. 1 in combination with art.
22 lit. b) of the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players, the DRC Judge is
competent to deal with matters which concern employment-related disputes with an
international dimension between players and clubs.
3. However, the DRC Judge referred to art. 25 par. 5 of the Regulations of the Status and
Transfer of Players, according to which “the Players’ Status Committee, the Dispute
Resolution Chamber, the single judge or the DRC judge (as the case may be) shall not
hear any case subject to these regulations if more than two years have elapsed since the
event giving rise to the dispute. Application of this time limit shall be examined ex officio
in each individual case.”
4. In relation to the aforementioned consideration, the Judge noted that the present
dispute was lodged on the basis of an alleged contract concluded on 1 October 2017 and
potentially valid until 30 May 2018, whereas the claim of the player was lodged on 2
February 2020. Therefore, in application of art. 25 par. 5 of the Regulations on the Status
and Transfer of Players, the Judge established that, in any case, his competence would
only concern events occurred until 2 February 2018, i.e. two years before the date of the
claim before FIFA. Therefore, in view of the applicable statute of limitations, the Judge
determined that the claim of the claimant is only partially admissible.
5. In continuation, the DRC Judge analysed which edition of the Regulations of the Status
and Transfer of Players should be applicable to the present matter. In this respect, the
Page 4 of 7
REF 20-00307
DRC Judge confirmed that in accordance with art. 26 par. 1 and 2 of the Regulations on
the Status and Transfer of Players, and considering the date when the claim was lodged,
the January 2020 edition of the aforementioned regulations (hereinafter: the
Regulations) is applicable to the matter at hand.
6. With the above having been established, the DRC Judge entered into the substance of
the matter. In doing so, it started to acknowledge the facts of the case as well as the
documents contained in the file. However, the DRC Judge emphasized that in the
following considerations it will refer only to facts, arguments and documentary evidence
which it considered pertinent for the assessment of the matter at hand.
7. In this respect, the Judge observed that the player lodged a claim before FIFA, alleging
that he signed a contract valid until May 2018.
8. Conversely, the Judge took note of the Respondent’s position, according to which
“negotiations might have taken place to sign a contract, but no contract was concluded.”
9. In view of the above, the Judge understood that the legal issue at stake is to determine
whether a valid contract was signed between the parties.
10. Having duly taken note of the documentation gathered during the course of the
investigation, the Judge held that in order for him to be able to assume that the Claimant
and the Respondent had indeed been bound through a contractual relationship with the
terms as described by the Claimant, he had to be established, beyond doubt, by
documentary evidence, that the said parties had indeed entered into a respective labour
agreement, and, if so, under which terms. In general, the Judge held that he could not
assume that an employment contract had been concluded by and between parties simply
based on circumstances which may be likely but are not certain to indicate the signing of
a contract. In this particular case, the Judge noted that the Claimant did not present a
contract that was signed by both parties (cf. point I. 3 above).
11. In addition, the Judge agreed that the Dispute Resolution Chamber must be very careful
with accepting documents, other than the employment contract, as evidence for the
conclusion of a contract
12. As a consequence, the Judge decided that, since the Claimant had not been able to prove
beyond doubt that an employment contract had validly been concluded between himself
and the Respondent, there was no possibility for the Chamber to enter into any further
question.
13. All the above led the Judge to conclude that the claim of the Claimant has to be rejected,
due to its lack of contractual basis.
Page 5 of 7
REF 20-00307
III. Decision of the DRC Judge
1.
The claim of the Claimant, Luiz Jorge Matheus, is rejected insofar it is admissible.
2. This decision is rendered without costs.
For the DRC Judge:
Emilio García Silvero
Chief Legal & Compliance Officer
Page 6 of 7
REF 20-00307
NOTE RELATED TO THE APPEAL PROCEDURE:
According to article 58 par. 1 of the FIFA Statutes, this decision may be appealed against before
the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) within 21 days of receipt of the notification of this
decision.
NOTE RELATED TO THE PUBLICATION:
FIFA may publish this decision. For reasons of confidentiality, FIFA may decide, at the request of a
party within five days of the notification of the motivated decision, to publish an anonymised or
a redacted version (cf. article 20 of the Procedural Rules).
CONTACT INFORMATION:
Fédération Internationale de Football Association
FIFA-Strasse 20 P.O. Box 8044 Zurich Switzerland
www.fifa.com | legal.fifa.com | [email protected] | T: +41 (0)43 222 7777
Page 7 of 7