Labour Disputes
Texto da decisão
REF. FPSD-20125
Decision of the
Dispute Resolution Chamber
passed on 9 February 2026
regarding an employment-related dispute concerning the player
Salami Baha Eddine
BY:
Johan VAN GAALEN (South Africa)
CLAIMANT / COUNTER-RESPONDENT:
Salami Baha Eddine, Tunisia
Represented by Kamel Laroussi
RESPONDENT / COUNTERCLAIMANT:
Al Afriqi Darnah, Libya
Represented by Muah Tashani
pg. 2
REF. FPSD-20125
I. Facts of the case
1.
On 15 September 2024, the Tunisian player Salami Baha Eddine (hereinafter: the Claimant
/ Counter-Respondent or the Player) and the Libyan club Al Afriqi Darnah (hereinafter: the
Respondent / Counterclaimant or the Club) concluded an employment contract (hereinafter:
the Contract) valid for the season 2024/2025.
2.
In accordance with the Contract, the Club undertook to pay the Player USD 30,000, i.e., USD
15,000 as a signing bonus and ten monthly salaries of USD 1,500.
3.
In addition, article 1.4 of the Contract read as follows, quoted verbatim:
“The club is entitled to claim from the player the costs associated with his athletic training in the
event that he leaves the club without the administration's authorization, or in the event of a
suspension of training, refusal to participate in matches, or signing with another club, contrary
to the conditions set forth herein.”
(Freely translated from French)
4.
Lastly, article 3 of the Contract stipulated the following, quoted verbatim:
“1. The club may terminate the contract if the player misses training sessions or official matches
without authorization, or when the technical staff notices a lack of seriousness on the part of
the player during friendly or official matches or training sessions.
2. The club may terminate the contract if the player does not comply with the official rules, or
when his or her level drops in a way that harms the team's collective performance.
3. In the event of repeated inappropriate behavior (indecent exposure) or behavior that violates
the rules of the sport.
4. In the event of termination, the club shall officially inform the player.
5. The club is not required to pay compensation in the above cases.
6. In all of the above cases, the player shall be deprived of all salaries and bonuses.”
(Freely translated from French)
5.
On 29 May 2025, the Player put the Club in default by sending a notice to an email address
allegedly belonging to the Club and to the Libyan Football Federation (hereinafter: the LFF)
and requested payment within 15 days of USD 10,500 as outstanding remuneration under
the Contract.
pg. 3
REF. FPSD-20125
6.
On 19 June 2025, the Player unilaterally terminated the Contract by sending a notice to an
email address allegedly belonging to the Club and to the LFF.
7.
On 29 June 2025, the Club sent the following correspondence to the Player via the Tunisian
Football Federation (hereinafter: the TFF), quoted verbatim:
“[…] On June 19, 2025, the player left the club without informing anyone and traveled back to
his home country while we were still in the middle of the Libyan First Division season.
Furthermore, the player has failed to fulfill his obligation to rejoin the club.
In light of the above, we hereby grant you a deadline of fifteen (15) days to rejoin the club and
fulfill your obligations. If the player fails to comply with this request within the given timeframe,
the club will have no choice but to terminate the contract with just cause. We will seek resolution
from the FIFA Football Tribunal (DRC) according to Articles 12 bis, 14, and 14bis of the FIFA
Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (RSTP). Additionally, we will demand
compensation for the remaining value of the contract, plus 5% interest as stipulated in Article
17 of the FIFA RSTP. The player will also be responsible for legal fees amounting to $2,000.
Thank you for your kind attention to the above. We are looking forward to hearing from you as
soon as possible. […]”
8.
On 30 June 2025, the Player answered the latest correspondence from the Club as follows,
quoted verbatim:
“[…] We acknowledge receipt of your email dated June 29, 2025, sent in your capacity as counsel
for Club Al Afriky Darnah, and hereby send you this notification in response.
On May 29, 2025, the Player sent the Club a formal notice, which remained unanswered,
demanding payment of the salaries and bonuses contractually owed.
In the absence of regularization within the specified time frame, and in accordance with the
provisions of Article 14 bis et seq. of the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (RSTP),
the Player unilaterally terminated his contract on June 19, 2025.
It should be noted that, according to the applicable regulations, said termination takes effect
upon notification, without any subsequent challenge by the Club being able to validly call into
question its validity, except in the case of new legal or regulatory developments, which does not
appear to be the case here.
The Player left Libyan territory on June 22, 2025, three (3) days after said notification, mistakenly
believing that the Club would fulfill its contractual obligations.
pg. 4
REF. FPSD-20125
Despite the seriousness of the breaches suffered, the Player, in a spirit of conciliation, remains
willing to consider any proposal for an amicable settlement of this dispute, in a professional
manner and with respect for his rights. […]”
(Freely translated from French)
9.
On 20 July 2025, the Club sent the following correspondence to the Player, quoted verbatim:
“[…] The player left the club without notifying anyone and returned to his home country while
we were still in the midst of the Libyan First Division season. Additionally, the player did not fulfill
his obligation to rejoin the club after we sent him a warning notice on 29 June 2025, and
provided him a deadline of fifteen (15) days to return and meet his obligations.
We are notifying you of the immediate unilateral termination of the player Bahaeddine Sallami's
contract. A claim for arrears and compensation will soon be submitted to the appropriate FIFA
football tribunal. […]”
10. On 21 July 2025, the Player answered the latest correspondence from the Club as follows,
quoted verbatim:
“[…] In response to your aforementioned email, I would like to inform you that any attempt by
the player to contest the termination of the contract is unfounded, null and void.
In full compliance with FIFA regulations, the player sent the club a formal notice dated May 29,
2025, demanding payment of his emoluments, including more than two months of unpaid
wages and bonuses. This formal notice, which gave the club the regulatory deadline to comply,
remained unanswered by you.
In view of this inaction, on June 19, 2025, the player notified the club of the termination of his
contract for just cause, in accordance with the provisions of Article 14 bis of the FIFA Regulations
on the Status and Transfer of Players (RSTP).
This notification was sent to the club's official addresses and to the Libyan Football Federation,
and received no objection or response from you.
It was only later, on June 29, 2025, that you sent a formal notice reproaching the player for
alleged absence from training and summoning him to rejoin the team—even though the
termination of the contract had already been notified in accordance with the forms and
deadlines required by FIFA regulations.
Moreover, we sent you a response dated July 2, 2025, informing you of the above facts.
pg. 5
REF. FPSD-20125
Finally, on July 20, 2025, you sent a notice of unilateral termination by the club, citing contractual
breaches on the part of the player, even though the latter had already terminated the contract
a month earlier for the same breaches committed by the club.
This attempt to reverse the chronology of established facts and legal acts is manifest, abusive,
and non-compliant with applicable rules.
Consequently, the player reserves the right to refer the matter to the competent authorities of
FIFA to assert his rights and seek compensation for wrongful termination of contract and
damages suffered. [...]”
(Freely translated from French)
11. On 23 July 2025, the Club informed the Player that his notice of termination of the Contract
dated 19 June 2025 was not sent to its email address.
12. The Player confirmed to the FIFA general secretariat that he remained unemployed
following the termination of the Contract.
II. Proceedings before FIFA
13. On 28 July 2025, the Player filed the claim at hand before FIFA. A summary of the parties’
respective positions is detailed below.
a. Claim of the Player
14. The Player argued that he terminated the Contract with just cause due to outstanding
remuneration.
15. In his claim, the Player stated that his outstanding remuneration on the date of his default
notice to the Club, i.e., 29 May 2025, corresponded to his monthly salaries under the
Contract from November 2024 to May 2025 totalling USD 10,500.
16. Having stated the above, the Player requested payment from the Club of USD 10,500 as
outstanding remuneration under the Contract and USD 2,400 as compensation for the
breach of the Contract, plus 5% interest p.a. as from the 15th day of each month until the
date of effective payment.
b. Reply and counterclaim of the Club
17. In its reply, the Club argued that it remitted USD 18,184 to the Player and that the latter
breached the Contract by leaving Libya without permission on 19 June 2025. In this respect,
pg. 6
REF. FPSD-20125
the Club argued that the Player’s notices dated 29 May 2025 and 19 June 2025 were in fact
not sent to its email address.
18. Accordingly, the Club lodged a counterclaim against the Player and submitted the following
requests for relief:
“5. To dismiss the complaint filed by the claimant for failing to follow the legally prescribed
procedures and deadlines.
6. Kindly accept this counterclaim, as it is founded on a valid legal basis.
7. Require the Claimant to pay $11,816 (eleven thousand eight hundred sixteen USD) as
compensation for breaching the contract, plus 5% per annum.
• The remaining salary of December 2024, $1,316 USD, plus 5% p.a.
• The Salary of February2025, $1,500 USD, plus 5% p.a
• The Salary of March2025 $1,500 USD, plus 5% p.a
• The Salary of April2025 $1,500 USD, plus 5% p.a
• The Salary of May2025 $1,500 USD, plus 5% p.a
• The Salary of June2025 $1,500 USD, plus 5% p.a
• The Salary of July2025 $1,500 USD, plus 5% p.a
• The Salary of August2025 $1,500 USD, plus 5% p.a
8. The Respondent is required to pay $2,000 in legal fees.
9. To impose on the player any sporting sanction the DRC deems necessary.
10. To impose and/or any other relief the DRC deems appropriate.”
c. Player’s reply to the Club’s counterclaim
19. In his reply to the counterclaim lodged by the Club, the Player stated that he put the Club
in default on 29 May 2025 and then terminated the Contract by sending notices to the
Club’s email address at his disposal. In this respect, the Player pointed out that he also sent
his notices to the LFF, just as the Club did in its default notice dated 29 June 2025 addressed
to the TFF.
20. In addition, the Player rejected the Club’s assertion that it remitted him USD 18,184 and
therefore reiterated his initial requests for relief.
pg. 7
REF. FPSD-20125
III. Considerations of the Dispute Resolution Chamber
a. Competence and applicable legal framework
21. First of all, the Single Judge of the Dispute Resolution Chamber (hereinafter: the Single Judge)
analysed whether he was competent to deal with the case at hand. In this respect, he took
note that the present matter was presented to FIFA on 28 July 2025 and submitted for
decision on 9 February 2026. Taking into account the wording of arts. 32 and 35 of the
January 2026 edition of the Procedural Rules Governing the Football Tribunal (hereinafter:
the Procedural Rules), the aforementioned edition of the Procedural Rules is applicable to
the matter at hand.
22. Furthermore, the Single Judge referred to art. 2 par. 1 of the Procedural Rules and observed
that in accordance with art. 23 par. 1 in combination with art. 22 par. 1 lit. b) of the
Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (hereinafter: the Regulations) (July 2025
edition), the Dispute Resolution Chamber is competent to deal with the matter at stake,
which concerns an employment-related dispute with an international dimension between
a Tunisian player and a Libyan club.
23. Subsequently, the Single Judge analysed which regulations should be applicable as to the
substance of the matter. In this respect, he confirmed that, in accordance with art. 29 of
the Regulations, the July 2025 edition of the Regulations is applicable to the matter at hand
as to the substance.
b. Burden of proof
24. The Single Judge recalled the basic principle of burden of proof, as stipulated in art. 13
par. 5 of the Procedural Rules, according to which a party claiming a right on the basis of
an alleged fact shall carry the respective burden of proof. Likewise, the Single Judge
stressed the wording of art. 13 par. 4 of the Procedural Rules, pursuant to which he may
consider evidence not filed by the parties, including without limitation the evidence
generated by or within the Transfer Matching System (hereinafter: the TMS).
c. Merits of the dispute
25. Having established the competence and the applicable regulations, the Single Judge
entered into the merits of the dispute. In this respect, the Single Judge started by
acknowledging all the above-mentioned facts as well as the arguments and the
documentation on file. However, the Single Judge emphasised that in the following
considerations he will refer only to the facts, arguments and documentary evidence, which
he considered pertinent for assessing the matter at hand.
pg. 8
REF. FPSD-20125
i. Main legal discussion and considerations
26. The Single Judge then moved to the substance of the matter and took note of the fact that
the parties strongly dispute the justice of the early termination of the Contract by the
Player, based on the alleged non-payment of certain financial obligations by the Club as
per the Contract, in accordance with art. 14bis of the Regulations.
27. In particular, the Single Judge recalled that, according to the Club, (i) it remitted USD 18,184
to the Player under the Contract; (ii) the Player breached the Contract by leaving Libya
without permission on 19 June 2025; and (iii) the Player’s notices dated 29 May 2025 and
19 June 2025 were in fact not sent to its email address.
28. In this context, the Single Judge acknowledged that his task was to determine, based on
the evidence presented by the parties, whether the claimed amounts had in fact remained
unpaid by the Club and, if so, whether the formal pre-requisites of art. 14bis of the
Regulations had in fact been fulfilled.
29. In this respect, the Single Judge referred to the wording of art. 14bis par. 1 of the
Regulations, in accordance with which, if a club unlawfully fails to pay a player at least two
monthly salaries on their due dates, the player will be deemed to have a just cause to
terminate his contract, provided that he has put the debtor club in default in writing and
has granted a deadline of at least 15 days for the debtor club to fully comply with its
financial obligation(s).
30. In the present matter, the Single Judge noted that the Player claims having not received his
monthly salaries as provided for in the Contract for the period from November 2024 to
May 2025, amounting to a total of seven months of outstanding salaries.
31. Having stated the above, the Single Judge recalled that the Club argued that it was not duly
notified of the Player’s default notice dated 29 May 2025, as well as his notice regarding the
termination of the Contract on 19 June 2025.
32. Accordingly, the Single Judge recalled the content of art. 13 par. 5 of the Procedural Rules,
according to which a party claiming a right on the basis of an alleged fact shall carry the
respective burden of proof. With this in mind, the Single Judge deemed that it was up to
the Player to prove that the Club was duly notified of his notices dated 29 May 2025 and 19
June 2025.
33. In casu, after a thorough analysis of the documentation on file, the Single Judge highlighted
that the Player failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish the notification of the Club
of his notices dated 29 May 2025 and 19 June 2025. In fact, the Single Judge pointed out
that there is no evidence on file demonstrating that the Player corresponded with the Club
via the email address he used to put the Club in default and then to terminate the Contract.
pg. 9
REF. FPSD-20125
34. Thus, the Single Judge considered that the requirements of art. 14bis of the Regulations
were not met in the present matter. Notwithstanding the above, the Single Judge recalled
that according to the Regulations, in general, just cause to terminate an employment
contract shall exist in any circumstance in which a party can no longer reasonably and in
good faith be expected to continue a contractual relationship (cf. art. 14 of the Regulations).
The Single Judge also held that the foregoing is in line with the well-established
jurisprudence of this Chamber and has been confirmed by the Court of Arbitration for
Sport (CAS).
35. Further, the Single Judge recalled the jurisprudence of the Football Tribunal, according to
which only a breach or misconduct which is of a certain severity justifies the termination of
a contract. In other words, only when there are objective criteria which do not reasonably
permit to expect the continuation of the employment relationship between the parties, a
contract may be terminated prematurely. Hence, if there are more lenient measures which
can be taken in order to ensure the fulfilment of the contractual duties by the counterparty,
such measures must be taken before terminating an employment contract. A premature
termination of an employment contract can only ever be an ultima ratio measure.
36. With the above principles in mind, the Single Judge observed that during the employment
relationship between the Player and the Club, the latter had repeatedly and for a significant
period of time been in breach of its contractual obligations towards the Player. In fact, the
Single Judge stressed that the fundamental terms and conditions which formed the basis
of the Contract were no longer respected by the Club. In particular, the Single Judge
underlined that it remained undisputed by the Club that, as of June 2025, the Player had
seven outstanding monthly salaries under the Contract, i.e., from November 2024 to May
2025.
37. In continuation, the Single Judge noted that, in the case at hand, the Club bore the burden
of proving that it indeed complied with the financial terms of the Contract concluded
between the parties. Nonetheless, the Single Judge determined that the evidence provided
by the Club does not prove the payment of the amounts claimed as outstanding by the
Player.
38. Considering the foregoing, the Single Judge concluded that seven outstanding monthly
salaries are significant enough to justify an ultima ratio measure for the termination of an
employment contract. Thus, the Single Judge decided, based on art. 14 of the Regulations,
that the Club’s repeated breaches of its contractual obligations towards the Player were of
such a severity that the Player had just cause to unilaterally terminate the Contract on 22
June 2025. In this respect, the Single Judge referred to the Player’s correspondence to the
Club dated 30 June 2025, in which he acknowledged to have left Libya on 22 June 2025 to
return to Tunisia, his home country. Thus, the Single Judge considered this date to be the
date of unilateral termination of the Contract.
pg. 10
REF. FPSD-20125
39. Lastly, the Single Judge determined that the foregoing finding that the Player had just cause
to unilaterally terminate the Contract therefore necessarily leads to the conclusion that the
counterclaim of the Club is rejected. For the sake of completeness, the Single Judge pointed
out that the Club’s counterclaim is based on its notice of termination of the Contract dated
20 July 2025, which post-dates the Contract’s expiry on 30 June 2025. In this respect, the
Single Judge referred to the information on the TMS, which indicates that the season
2024/2025 in Libya ended on 30 June 2025. In any event, the Single Judge stressed that the
Contract had already been terminated by the Player on 22 June 2025.
ii. Consequences
40. Having stated the above, the Single Judge turned his attention to the question of the
consequences of such unjustified breach of contract committed by the Club.
41. The Single Judge observed that the Player’s outstanding remuneration under the Contract
at the time of its termination, coupled with the specific requests for relief of the Player, is
equivalent to the monthly salaries from November 2024 to June 2025. Specifically,
regarding the salary for June 2025, the Single Judge held that, given that the termination of
the Contract occurred on 22 June 2025, and in accordance with the standard practice of
the Football Tribunal, this salary should be awarded in full as outstanding remuneration.
42. As a consequence, and in accordance with the general legal principle of pacta sunt servanda,
the Single Judge decided that the Club is liable to pay to the Player USD 12,000, i.e., USD
1,500 x 8 months.
43. In addition, the Single Judge remarked that the Contract did not provide a due date for the
salaries and, therefore, based on standard practice, he interpreted that the salaries were
to be paid by the end of each month. Hence, taking into consideration the Player’s request
as well as the constant practice of the Football Tribunal in this regard, the Single Judge
decided to award the Player interest at the rate of 5% p.a. on his outstanding remuneration
as follows:
•
Over the amount of USD 1,500, i.e., the monthly salary for November 2024, as from
1 December 2024 until the date of effective payment;
•
Over the amount of USD 1,500, i.e., the monthly salary for December 2024, as from
1 January 2025 until the date of effective payment;
•
Over the amount of USD 1,500, i.e., the monthly salary for January 2025, as from 1
February 2025 until the date of effective payment;
•
Over the amount of USD 1,500, i.e., the monthly salary for February 2025, as from 1
March 2025 until the date of effective payment;
pg. 11
REF. FPSD-20125
•
Over the amount of USD 1,500, i.e., the monthly salary for March 2025, as from 1
April 2025 until the date of effective payment;
•
Over the amount of USD 1,500, i.e., the monthly salary for April 2025, as from 1 May
2025 until the date of effective payment;
•
Over the amount of USD 1,500, i.e., the monthly salary for May 2025, as from 1 June
2025 until the date of effective payment; and
•
Over the amount of USD 1,500, i.e., the monthly salary for June 2025, as from 22
June 2025 until the date of effective payment.
44. Lastly, the Single Judge recalled that, based on the dates retrieved from the TMS, the
Contract was set to expire on 30 June 2025. Therefore, given that the Contract was
terminated only eight days before its expiry date and that the full salary for June 2025 has
been awarded as outstanding remuneration, the Single Judge stressed that, although the
Player had just cause to terminate the Contract, he is not entitled to any further amount as
compensation, since he is already receiving the entire value of the Contract.
iii. Compliance with monetary decisions
45. Finally, taking into account the applicable Regulations, the Single Judge referred to art. 24
par. 1 and 2 of the Regulations, which stipulate that, with its decision, the pertinent FIFA
deciding body shall also rule on the consequences deriving from the failure of the
concerned party to pay the relevant amounts of outstanding remuneration and/or
compensation in due time.
46. In this regard, the Single Judge highlighted that, against clubs, the consequence of the
failure to pay the relevant amounts in due time shall consist of a ban from registering any
new players, either nationally or internationally, up until the due amounts are paid. The
overall maximum duration of the registration ban shall be of up to three entire and
consecutive registration periods.
47. Therefore, bearing in mind the above, the Single Judge decided that the Club must pay the
full amount due (including all applicable interest) to the Player within 45 days of notification
of the decision, failing which, at the request of the Player, a ban from registering any new
players, either nationally or internationally, for the maximum duration of three entire and
consecutive registration periods shall become immediately effective on the Club in
accordance with art. 24 par. 2, 4, and 7 of the Regulations.
48. The Club shall make full payment (including all applicable interest) to the bank account
provided by the Player in the Bank Account Registration Form, which is attached to the
present decision.
pg. 12
REF. FPSD-20125
49. The Single Judge recalled that the above-mentioned ban will be lifted immediately and prior
to its complete serving upon payment of the due amounts, in accordance with art. 24 par.
8 of the Regulations.
d. Costs
50. The Single Judge referred to art. 25 par. 1 of the Procedural Rules, according to which
“Procedures are free of charge where at least one of the parties is a player, coach, football agent,
or match agent”. Accordingly, the Single Judge decided that no procedural costs were to be
imposed on the parties.
51. Likewise, and for the sake of completeness, the Single Judge recalled the contents of art.
25 par. 8 of the Procedural Rules and decided that no procedural compensation shall be
awarded in these proceedings.
52. Lastly, the Single Judge concluded his deliberations by rejecting any other requests for
relief made by any of the parties.
pg. 13
REF. FPSD-20125
IV. Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber
1.
The claim of the Claimant / Counter-Respondent, Salami Baha Eddine, is partially accepted.
2.
The counterclaim of the of the Respondent / Counterclaimant, Al Afriqi Darnah, is rejected.
3.
The Respondent / Counterclaimant must pay to the Claimant / Counter-Respondent the
following amount:
- USD 12,000 as outstanding remuneration plus 5% interest p.a. as follows:
- 5% interest p.a. over the amount of 1,500 as from 1 December 2024 until the date of
effective payment;
- 5% interest p.a. over the amount of 1,500 as from 1 January 2025 until the date of
effective payment;
- 5% interest p.a. over the amount of 1,500 as from 1 February 2025 until the date of
effective payment;
- 5% interest p.a. over the amount of 1,500 as from 1 March 2025 until the date of
effective payment;
- 5% interest p.a. over the amount of 1,500 as from 1 April 2025 until the date of effective
payment;
- 5% interest p.a. over the amount of 1,500 as from 1 May 2025 until the date of effective
payment;
- 5% interest p.a. over the amount of 1,500 as from 1 June 2025 until the date of effective
payment; and
- 5% interest p.a. over the amount of 1,500 as from 22 June 2025 until the date of
effective payment.
4.
Any further claims of the Claimant / Counter-Respondent are rejected.
5.
Full payment (including all applicable interest) shall be made to the bank account indicated
in the enclosed Bank Account Registration Form.
6.
Pursuant to art. 24 of the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players, if full payment
(including all applicable interest) is not made within 45 days of notification of this decision,
the following consequences shall apply:
1. The Respondent / Counterclaimant shall be banned from registering any new players,
either nationally or internationally, up until the due amount is paid. The maximum
duration of the ban shall be of up to three entire and consecutive registration periods.
2. The present matter shall be submitted, upon request, to the FIFA Disciplinary Committee
in the event that full payment (including all applicable interest) is still not made by the
end of the three entire and consecutive registration periods.
pg. 14
REF. FPSD-20125
7.
The consequences shall only be enforced at the request of the Claimant / CounterRespondent in accordance with art. 24 par. 7 and 8 and art. 25 of the Regulations on the
Status and Transfer of Players.
8.
This decision is rendered without costs.
For the Football Tribunal:
Emilio García Silvero
Chief Legal & Compliance Officer
pg. 15
REF. FPSD-20125
NOTE RELATED TO THE APPEAL PROCEDURE:
According to art. 50 par. 1 of the FIFA Statutes, this decision may be appealed against before
the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) within 21 days of receipt of the notification of this
decision.
NOTE RELATED TO THE PUBLICATION:
FIFA may publish this decision. For reasons of confidentiality, FIFA may decide, at the request
of a party within five days of the notification of the motivated decision, to publish an
anonymised or a redacted version (cf., art. 17 of the Procedural Rules Governing the Football
Tribunal).
CONTACT INFORMATION:
Fédération Internationale de Football Association – Legal & Compliance Division
396 Alhambra Circle, 6th floor, Coral Gables, Miami, Florida, USA 33134
legal.fifa.com | [email protected] | T: +41 (0)43 222 7777
pg. 16