Inadmissibility Appeals Conditions Procedure Application for revision New fact Application concerning an order made under Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure
Sumário
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 November 2007.
Herbert Meister v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Procedure - Application for revision - Application concerning an order made under Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure - Conditions - Appeals - New fact - Inadmissibility.
Case C-12/05 P-REV.
Texto da decisão
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 November 2007 – Meister v OHIM
(Case C-12/05 P-REV)
Procedure – Application for revision – Application concerning an order made under Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure – Conditions – Appeals – New fact – Inadmissibility
Procedure – Revision of a judgment – Conditions for the admissibility thereof – New fact – Meaning – Fact known before delivery of the judgment – Not included – Inadmissible (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 44) (see paras 15-18)
Re:
| Application of revision concerning the Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 December 2006 in Case C-12/05 P. |
Operative part
|
|
The application for revision brought by Mr Meister is dismissed as inadmissible; |
|
|
Mr Meister and the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) are each ordered to bear their own costs. |