Inadmissibility Action for annulment Action for damages Transitional measures Common organisation of the markets Bananas Article 30 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 Judgment finding that the Commission had failed to act Failure to give effect to a judgment of the Court Application for an order that effect be given to the judgment by way of financial equivalent Compensation for non material damage Unlawful failure to act on the part of the Commission Suspension of the limitation period Article 46 of the Statute of the Court of Justice
Sumário
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 15 October 2008.
Camar Srl v Commission of the European Communities.
Common organisation of the markets - Bananas - Transitional measures - Article 30 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 - Judgment finding that the Commission had failed to act - Failure to give effect to a judgment of the Court - Action for annulment - Application for an order that effect be given to the judgment by way of financial equivalent - Compensation for non-material damage - Unlawful failure to act on the part of the Commission - Action for damages - Suspension of the limitation period - Article 46 of the Statute of the Court of Justice - Inadmissibility.
Joined cases T-457/04 and T-223/05.
Texto da decisão
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 15 October 2008 – Camar v Commission
(Joined Cases T-457/04 and T-223/05)
Common organisation of the markets – Bananas – Transitional measures – Article 30 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 – Judgment finding that the Commission had failed to act – Failure to give effect to a judgment of the Court – Action for annulment – Application for an order that effect be given to the judgment by way of financial equivalent – Compensation for non-material damage – Unlawful failure to act on the part of the Commission – Action for damages – Suspension of the limitation period – Article 46 of the Statute of the Court of Justice – Inadmissibility
1. Actions for annulment – Judgment annulling a measure – Effects – Obligation to implement (Arts 230 EC, 232 EC, 233 EC and 288, para. 2, EC) (see paras 39-41, 49-50)
2. Non-contractual liability – Conditions – Unlawfulness – Damage – Causal link – Failure to fulfil the obligation to implement an annulling judgment (Art. 288, para. 2, EC) (see paras 57-58, 60-62)
3. Actions for damages – Time-limit for instituting proceedings – Limitation period of five years (Art. 288, para. 2, EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 46) (see paras 75, 77, 79-80)
Re:
| In Case T‑457/04, application, first, for annulment of the Commission's decision not to give effect to paragraph 1 of the operative part of the judgment of the Court of 8 June 2000, | Camar and Tico | v | Commission and Council | (Joined Cases T‑79/96, T‑260/97 and T‑117/98 [2000] ECR II‑2193), contained in the letter of 10 September 2004, secondly, for an order that the Commission give effect to paragraph 1 of the operative part of the abovementioned judgment in | Camar and Tico | v | Commission and Council | by the financial equivalent of the value of the certificates that it has not issued and, thirdly, for an order that the Commission pay compensation for non-material loss, and in Case T‑223/05, application for an order that the Commission pay compensation, on the basis of the non-contractual liability of the European Community, for the loss which the applicant has suffered. |
Operative part
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls the decision of the Commission contained in the letter of 10 September 2004 from the Director General of the Directorate General ‘Agriculture’ refusing to give effect to paragraph 1 of the operative part of the judgment of the Court of 8 June 2000, Camar and Tico v Commission and Council (Joined Cases T‑79/96, T‑260/97 and T‑117/98 [2000] ECR II‑2193); |
|
2. |
For the rest, dismisses the action in Case T‑457/04 as unfounded; |
|
3. |
Dismisses the action in Case T‑223/05 as inadmissible; |
|
4. |
In Case T‑457/04, orders Camar Srl and the Commission each to bear half of their own costs and to pay half of the costs of the other party; |
|
5. |
In Case T‑223/05, orders Camar Srl to bear its own costs and to pay the Commission's costs. |