Community trade mark Opposition proceedings Relative ground for refusal No likelihood of confusion Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) Partial refusal to register Application for Community word mark P&G PRESTIGE BEAUTE Earlier national figurative marks Prestige
Sumário
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2010.
The Procter & Gamble Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark P&G PRESTIGE BEAUTE - Earlier national figurative marks Prestige - Partial refusal to register - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009).
Case T-366/07.
Texto da decisão
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2010 – Procter & Gamble v OHIM – Prestige Cosmetics (P&G PRESTIGE BEAUTE)
(Case T-366/07)
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark P&G PRESTIGE BEAUTE – Earlier national figurative marks Prestige – Partial refusal to register – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 51, 85)
Re:
| ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 July 2007 (Case R 681/2006-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Prestige Cosmetics Srl and The Procter & Gamble Company. |
Information relating to the case
|
Applicant for the Community trade mark: |
The Procter & Gamble Company |
|
Community trade mark sought: |
Word mark P&G PRESTIGE BEAUTE for, inter alia, goods in Class 3 |
|
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: |
Prestige Cosmetics Srl |
|
Mark or sign cited in opposition: |
National figurative marks Prestige for goods in Class 3 |
|
Decision of the Opposition Division: |
Opposition partially upheld |
|
Decision of the Board of Appeal: |
Appeal dismissed |
Operative part
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 19 July 2007 (Case R 681/2006-2); |
|
2. |
Orders OHIM to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by The Procter & Gamble Company in the proceedings before the Court; |
|
3. |
Orders Prestige Cosmetics SpA to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by The Procter & Gamble Company in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal; |
|
4. |
Dismisses the action as to the remainder. |